Native American Rights, Federal Government Plenary Power and Land Takin

Native American Rights, Federal political sympathies Plenary Power and Land TakingsAbstractNative Americans atomic number 18 entitled to the same Constitutional protections that guard other citizens from federal judicature infringement. Plenary power and the accompanying seizure and use of indigenous impart bases have violated the rights of Native Americans and demonstrated the inability of the federal political sympathies to manage Indian affairs. The United States should give ownership and control of original, non-privately have land bases back to tribes. This course of action would end treaty violation, remunerate tribes for land takings, prevent bureaucrats from implementing policies that obstruct the ability of Native Americans to participate in their religion, and prevent the serious cultural loss that may occur if the establishment continues to use Native American land for self-interested purposes. Although the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 formally made Native Ameri cans United States citizens, Native Americans afoot(predicate)ly lack the legitimate protection that guards other citizens from federal domination (Custo and total heat X). The core classless concepts of fairness, justice, and consent of the governed have not yet been fully realized for tribal people, despite their citizenship (Wilkins 20). As stated by Helen Hunt Jackson, a famed author and social reformer, treatment of Native Americans has outraged principles of justice (Custo and Henry 40). Native Americans, wards of the federal government, are locked in a grossly inequitable, politically dependent relationship, in which governmental infringement and injustice are the norm. (Williams 27). The current policy of federal plenary power over Indian tribes and the confiscation and desecration of I... ...iverse. (21 Jan. 2001).Martin v. Waddell. 41 U.S. 367. U.S. Supreme Court. 1842. LEXIS-NEXIS academic Universe. (21 Jan 2001).Northrup, Jim. Rez Road Follies. Minneapolis Universi ty of Minnesota Press, 1997. terzetto Affiliated Tribes of Fort Berthold Reservation v. United States. 419 U.S. 901. No. 73-2062. U.S. Supreme Court. 1974. LEXIS-NEXIS Academic Universe. (20 Jan. 2001).Wilkins, David. American Indian Sovereignty and the U.S. Supreme Court The Masking of Justice. capital of Texas University of Texas Press, 1997.Wood, Mary. Protecting the Attributes of Native Sovereignty A New Trust figure for Federal Actions Affecting Tribal Land and Resources. Utah Law freshen (1995). LEXIS NEXIS Academic Universe. 8 Jan. 2001.Wunder, John. Retained by the People A memoir of American Indians and the Bill of Rights. New York Oxford University Press, 1994.